PhD Lunch Seminars Amsterdam

Speaker(s)
Malin Gardberg (Erasmus University Rotterdam) and Gabriele Ciminelli (University of Amsterdam)
Date
Monday, 15 February 2016
Location
Amsterdam

12:00
Determinants of International Consumption Risk Sharing in Developing Countries
Malin Gardberg (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Complete financial markets allow countries to share their consumption risks internationally, thereby creating welfare gains through lower volatility of aggregate consumption. This paper empirically looks at international consumption risk sharing and its determinants in a panel of 123 countries from 1970 to 2011. Contrary to some previous studies, I show that financial integration, measured either as an index of financial reform, capital account openness or as total external liabilities to GDP, has a significantly positive impact on international consumption risk sharing in developing countries. This result applies especially to poorer developing countries. Emerging market countries however seem to have gained less from financial integration in terms of consumption risk sharing. Remittance flows from migrant workers’ positively affect risk sharing in developing countries, whereas foreign aid does not have a significant impact. Moreover, there is some evidence that high income inequality and also a high share of low income individuals reduces consumption smoothing in less developed countries. A lower degree of financial integration and higher inequality can thus partly explain why the degree of risk sharing is lower in developing countries than in advanced economies.

********

13:00
Central Bank Signaling Matters: Evidence from the Sensitivity of Financial Variables to Macroeconomic News
Gabriele Ciminelli (University of Amsterdam)

Two strands of the literature study how financial variables react to (i) macroeconomic news and (ii) unconventional monetary policy announcements. I go a step further and investigate whether the sensitivity of domestic financial variables to US labor market news changed following unconventional monetary policy shocks by the Federal Reserve. The results indicate that this was indeed the case. Following the introduction of calendar-based forward guidance, data indicating higher than expected job creation led to a significant steepening of the yield curve and a marked increase of inflation expectations. Conversely, after Bernanke’s Taper Tantrum the same data caused a hump-shaped reaction of the yield curve and no movement in expected inflation. I interpret these findings as suggestive evidence pointing to the existence of a signaling channel of monetary policy. Understanding how this channel works is crucial to explain the reaction of financial variables to news.